<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 482 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on multiple issues related to excise duty liability on levy sugar. It held that there was no excess liability on the amount realized for the clearance of levy sugar, and subsidies granted by the Government for excisable goods were not excisable. The Tribunal directed a recalculation of duty liability based on the higher price of the manufactured goods. Additionally, it remanded the matter regarding interest liability during adjudication for further review, citing relevant legal precedents to support its decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:37:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 482 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on multiple issues related to excise duty liability on levy sugar. It held that there was no excess liability on the amount realized for the clearance of levy sugar, and subsidies granted by the Government for excisable goods were not excisable. The Tribunal directed a recalculation of duty liability based on the higher price of the manufactured goods. Additionally, it remanded the matter regarding interest liability during adjudication for further review, citing relevant legal precedents to support its decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>