https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78402 A proposed challenge to a penalty imposed on an excise clerk was rejected at the admission stage because no substantial question of law arose. The Court noted that the clerk was a junior employee with limited service and that his statement showed he acted on instructions from the Managing Director. On those facts, the clerk's role was materially different from the Managing Director's, and the appeal was not fit for admission. The proposed substantial question of law was therefore declined. en-us Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78402 A proposed challenge to a penalty imposed on an excise clerk was rejected at the admission stage because no substantial question of law arose. The Court noted that the clerk was a junior employee with limited service and that his statement showed he acted on instructions from the Managing Director. On those facts, the clerk's role was materially different from the Managing Director's, and the appeal was not fit for admission. The proposed substantial question of law was therefore declined. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78402