<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 475 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78390</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the lower court&#039;s decision to sentence the respondent to the period already served in custody and a fine of Rs. 2,500 for an offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite acknowledging the inadequacy of the initial sentence, the court considered the respondent&#039;s prolonged exposure to criminal prosecution and the significant distress caused by the extended legal process, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:27:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 475 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78390</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the lower court&#039;s decision to sentence the respondent to the period already served in custody and a fine of Rs. 2,500 for an offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite acknowledging the inadequacy of the initial sentence, the court considered the respondent&#039;s prolonged exposure to criminal prosecution and the significant distress caused by the extended legal process, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>