<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 522 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78381</link>
    <description>A tribunal cannot reduce or delete statutory excise penalties without giving reasons and identifying the enabling provision for such relief. Where the order fails to examine the relevant provisions or explain the basis for exercising penalty-relief power, the decision is unsustainable and may be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 522 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78381</link>
      <description>A tribunal cannot reduce or delete statutory excise penalties without giving reasons and identifying the enabling provision for such relief. Where the order fails to examine the relevant provisions or explain the basis for exercising penalty-relief power, the decision is unsustainable and may be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>