<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 459 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78377</link>
    <description>The Tribunal disposed of the stay application and appeal together, waiving the pre-deposit requirement due to the smallness of the demand. The disallowance of Cenvat credit for service tax on cellular phones was upheld, while for insurance services, the Appellant was given the opportunity to provide relevant documents for reconsideration. The penalty imposition was found unjustified, granting full relief to the Appellant. The appeal was allowed partially, remanding the issue of set-off of service tax against duty liability for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 459 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78377</link>
      <description>The Tribunal disposed of the stay application and appeal together, waiving the pre-deposit requirement due to the smallness of the demand. The disallowance of Cenvat credit for service tax on cellular phones was upheld, while for insurance services, the Appellant was given the opportunity to provide relevant documents for reconsideration. The penalty imposition was found unjustified, granting full relief to the Appellant. The appeal was allowed partially, remanding the issue of set-off of service tax against duty liability for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>