<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 736 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the case might not be time-barred and could potentially suffer from a violation of natural justice. Therefore, the Tribunal ordered a status quo ante during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The issues in this case were deemed similar to other pending cases, leading to a directive for analogous hearing with other similar matters scheduled for 13-8-2009. Both parties were instructed to take notice for the hearing on that date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 736 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the case might not be time-barred and could potentially suffer from a violation of natural justice. Therefore, the Tribunal ordered a status quo ante during the appeal&#039;s pendency. The issues in this case were deemed similar to other pending cases, leading to a directive for analogous hearing with other similar matters scheduled for 13-8-2009. Both parties were instructed to take notice for the hearing on that date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>