<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 466 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78335</link>
    <description>In customs valuation adjudication, an order is vitiated where the affected party is denied a meaningful opportunity to present its case, including representation through counsel and access to relevant documents. The court held that quasi-judicial proceedings affecting valuation and related fiscal consequences must comply with natural justice and fair procedure. Because the petitioner had sought time to collect documents and had filed a vakalatnama, the prompt passing of the order without effective consideration of that request breached procedural fairness. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication with a proper hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:53:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 466 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78335</link>
      <description>In customs valuation adjudication, an order is vitiated where the affected party is denied a meaningful opportunity to present its case, including representation through counsel and access to relevant documents. The court held that quasi-judicial proceedings affecting valuation and related fiscal consequences must comply with natural justice and fair procedure. Because the petitioner had sought time to collect documents and had filed a vakalatnama, the prompt passing of the order without effective consideration of that request breached procedural fairness. The impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication with a proper hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>