<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 446 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78329</link>
    <description>Replacement of an existing furnace with a higher-capacity furnace, together with corresponding upgrades to auxiliary facilities, can amount to substantial expansion where the installed capacity increases by at least 25% after the relevant date. The Department&#039;s circular, read with the exemption notification, did not limit expansion to cases involving only additional plant and machinery; the decisive test was whether the unit had materially increased its installed capacity to the prescribed extent. On the facts, capacity rose from 4 MT to 5 MT per charge, supported by enhanced electric power sanction and related facilities, so the unit qualified for exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-C.E.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:48:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 446 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78329</link>
      <description>Replacement of an existing furnace with a higher-capacity furnace, together with corresponding upgrades to auxiliary facilities, can amount to substantial expansion where the installed capacity increases by at least 25% after the relevant date. The Department&#039;s circular, read with the exemption notification, did not limit expansion to cases involving only additional plant and machinery; the decisive test was whether the unit had materially increased its installed capacity to the prescribed extent. On the facts, capacity rose from 4 MT to 5 MT per charge, supported by enhanced electric power sanction and related facilities, so the unit qualified for exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-C.E.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>