<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 462 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, but set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant&#039;s challenge on these two issues was analyzed, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 462 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, but set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant&#039;s challenge on these two issues was analyzed, leading to a partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>