https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78317 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeals against Orders-In-Original dropping the demand concerning imported kits with concealed original brand names. The Revenue failed to demonstrate the flaws in the earlier order or reasons for the change in stance, leading to the appeal being unsubstantiated and rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the Revenue to provide substantial grounds for appeal and show the merits of the earlier decision, which the Revenue failed to do in this case. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:41:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78317 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeals against Orders-In-Original dropping the demand concerning imported kits with concealed original brand names. The Revenue failed to demonstrate the flaws in the earlier order or reasons for the change in stance, leading to the appeal being unsubstantiated and rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for the Revenue to provide substantial grounds for appeal and show the merits of the earlier decision, which the Revenue failed to do in this case. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78317