https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78307 Withdrawal of the exemption for beedi packages under Rule 34(c) of the Standards of Weight and Measures (Packages Commodities) Rules, 1977 was treated as a policy-based delegated legislative change. The challenge failed because no violation of the parent Act, the rule-making power, or the Constitution was shown, and the notification was not otherwise unreasonable or ultra vires. Alleged hardship to manufacturers and workers was held to be a matter for executive and legislative assessment, not a ground for judicial invalidation. Judicial review ordinarily does not extend to the availability or withdrawal of a commodity exemption when the measure is otherwise within lawful policy discretion. en-us Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:36:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78307 Withdrawal of the exemption for beedi packages under Rule 34(c) of the Standards of Weight and Measures (Packages Commodities) Rules, 1977 was treated as a policy-based delegated legislative change. The challenge failed because no violation of the parent Act, the rule-making power, or the Constitution was shown, and the notification was not otherwise unreasonable or ultra vires. Alleged hardship to manufacturers and workers was held to be a matter for executive and legislative assessment, not a ground for judicial invalidation. Judicial review ordinarily does not extend to the availability or withdrawal of a commodity exemption when the measure is otherwise within lawful policy discretion. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78307