https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78283 The case involved a dispute over the denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant due to missing information on invoices and illegibility of input services. The Judicial Member remanded the case back to the original authority for re-examination, emphasizing the need for a detailed review of the invoices and a fair hearing for the appellant. The decision underscored the importance of proper documentation for claiming Cenvat credit and the necessity for a thorough assessment of input service eligibility. The aim was to ensure a fair evaluation based on legal provisions and precedents. en-us Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:02:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78283 The case involved a dispute over the denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant due to missing information on invoices and illegibility of input services. The Judicial Member remanded the case back to the original authority for re-examination, emphasizing the need for a detailed review of the invoices and a fair hearing for the appellant. The decision underscored the importance of proper documentation for claiming Cenvat credit and the necessity for a thorough assessment of input service eligibility. The aim was to ensure a fair evaluation based on legal provisions and precedents. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78283