<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 207 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78277</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order directing the petitioner to predeposit Rs.3 Crores within 12 weeks. The appeals would be deemed rejected if the deposit was not made within the stipulated time frame. The Tribunal was directed to proceed with the appeal upon compliance with the deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 207 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78277</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s order directing the petitioner to predeposit Rs.3 Crores within 12 weeks. The appeals would be deemed rejected if the deposit was not made within the stipulated time frame. The Tribunal was directed to proceed with the appeal upon compliance with the deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>