<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 445 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78270</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for abatement under Notification No. 32/04-ST, vacated the demand of Rs. 72,028, and set aside the penalty under section 78 of the Act. The penalty under section 77 was upheld. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the original authority for a fresh decision on liability and penalties, granting the appellant an opportunity to present its case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 445 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78270</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for abatement under Notification No. 32/04-ST, vacated the demand of Rs. 72,028, and set aside the penalty under section 78 of the Act. The penalty under section 77 was upheld. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the original authority for a fresh decision on liability and penalties, granting the appellant an opportunity to present its case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>