<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 435 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78260</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s claim for double taxation relief and verification of T.D.S. certificates from Hong Kong and the United States. The court advised the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies within the framework of the Act, emphasizing the need to follow prescribed procedures for addressing assessment disputes and benefit claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 435 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78260</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s claim for double taxation relief and verification of T.D.S. certificates from Hong Kong and the United States. The court advised the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies within the framework of the Act, emphasizing the need to follow prescribed procedures for addressing assessment disputes and benefit claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>