<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 64 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78245</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court emphasized that the opinion of the District Valuation Officer alone is insufficient for reopening assessments under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer must independently assess the information collected. In this case, no incriminating evidence was found during the search operation to suggest any payment beyond the declared value in the sale deeds. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, highlighting the significance of evidence and the burden of proof in income tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 64 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78245</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court emphasized that the opinion of the District Valuation Officer alone is insufficient for reopening assessments under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer must independently assess the information collected. In this case, no incriminating evidence was found during the search operation to suggest any payment beyond the declared value in the sale deeds. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, highlighting the significance of evidence and the burden of proof in income tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>