https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78244 Where the prosecution had already been granted a fair opportunity to examine PW-2 under Section 311 CrPC and failed to produce the witness on the adjourned date, the High Court declined to interfere under Section 482 CrPC. The Court noted that the request to keep evidence open was inconsistent with the prosecution's earlier claim that the witness was available, and that sufficient time had already been afforded to lead evidence. Interference with the trial court's decision to close evidence and proceed to final arguments was therefore not warranted, and the petition was dismissed. en-us Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:37:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78244 Where the prosecution had already been granted a fair opportunity to examine PW-2 under Section 311 CrPC and failed to produce the witness on the adjourned date, the High Court declined to interfere under Section 482 CrPC. The Court noted that the request to keep evidence open was inconsistent with the prosecution's earlier claim that the witness was available, and that sufficient time had already been afforded to lead evidence. Interference with the trial court's decision to close evidence and proceed to final arguments was therefore not warranted, and the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78244