<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 62 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78243</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the ITA order adding loans advanced to the assessee, as the Tribunal found the addition was deleted by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal based on credible evidence provided by the creditors and assessee. The Court upheld the decision, stating no substantial question of law arose, and found the decision fair and reasonable. The appeal was dismissed in limine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 62 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78243</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the ITA order adding loans advanced to the assessee, as the Tribunal found the addition was deleted by the CIT(A) and the Tribunal based on credible evidence provided by the creditors and assessee. The Court upheld the decision, stating no substantial question of law arose, and found the decision fair and reasonable. The appeal was dismissed in limine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>