<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 494 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78207</link>
    <description>The Customs Department imposed penalties and confiscated diamonds from a company for non-availability of certain diamonds for physical confiscation. The company appealed to the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, which stayed penalty recovery. The company sought the return of documents detained by the Customs Department. The High Court held that the Customs Department had no authority to detain the documents once goods were cleared and penalties were under appeal. The court directed the Customs Department to return the documents to the company, emphasizing that appellate authorities cannot worsen the appellant&#039;s position without a cross-appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 494 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78207</link>
      <description>The Customs Department imposed penalties and confiscated diamonds from a company for non-availability of certain diamonds for physical confiscation. The company appealed to the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, which stayed penalty recovery. The company sought the return of documents detained by the Customs Department. The High Court held that the Customs Department had no authority to detain the documents once goods were cleared and penalties were under appeal. The court directed the Customs Department to return the documents to the company, emphasizing that appellate authorities cannot worsen the appellant&#039;s position without a cross-appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>