<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 492 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78202</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on GTA service used to transport finished goods from the factory to the buyer&#039;s premises was treated as prima facie admissible where the sales were on a FOR destination basis, freight was borne by the assessee, and the invoice showed no freight charge to the buyer. On those facts, the Tribunal found a prima facie case in favour of the appellant and accepted that the cited decisions and Board circular supported the claim. The result was waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of duty and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 492 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78202</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on GTA service used to transport finished goods from the factory to the buyer&#039;s premises was treated as prima facie admissible where the sales were on a FOR destination basis, freight was borne by the assessee, and the invoice showed no freight charge to the buyer. On those facts, the Tribunal found a prima facie case in favour of the appellant and accepted that the cited decisions and Board circular supported the claim. The result was waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of duty and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>