<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 534 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78201</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal for refund of accumulated credit for exports. The Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the case for verification and quantification of the claim, which the appellant struggled to provide. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s duty to establish the nexus and furnish necessary data for refund quantification, allowing the appellant to address all concerns before the original adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 534 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78201</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad rejected the appellant&#039;s appeal for refund of accumulated credit for exports. The Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the case for verification and quantification of the claim, which the appellant struggled to provide. The Tribunal emphasized the appellant&#039;s duty to establish the nexus and furnish necessary data for refund quantification, allowing the appellant to address all concerns before the original adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>