https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78197 An aggrieved importer challenging a finding of adulteration was required to pursue the designated appellate remedy before the Central Food Laboratory, Kolkata, because the relevant public notice had expressly provided that forum. The writ petition was therefore not entertained on merits, and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate process instead of seeking writ relief. The Court further indicated that, if an appeal is filed, it should be dealt with by an officer other than the one who earlier passed the order, and with reference to the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and the Rules framed under it. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78197 An aggrieved importer challenging a finding of adulteration was required to pursue the designated appellate remedy before the Central Food Laboratory, Kolkata, because the relevant public notice had expressly provided that forum. The writ petition was therefore not entertained on merits, and the petitioner was relegated to the appellate process instead of seeking writ relief. The Court further indicated that, if an appeal is filed, it should be dealt with by an officer other than the one who earlier passed the order, and with reference to the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and the Rules framed under it. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78197