<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 465 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78182</link>
    <description>In a service tax dispute, the CESTAT partly allowed waiver of pre-deposit by directing the appellant to deposit a specified amount towards tax. Subject to that deposit, the remaining interest and penalty were waived, and recovery of the balance was stayed pending disposal of the appeal. The operative effect was a conditional interim relief: partial compliance with the pre-deposit requirement secured suspension of further recovery on the remaining disputed amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 465 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78182</link>
      <description>In a service tax dispute, the CESTAT partly allowed waiver of pre-deposit by directing the appellant to deposit a specified amount towards tax. Subject to that deposit, the remaining interest and penalty were waived, and recovery of the balance was stayed pending disposal of the appeal. The operative effect was a conditional interim relief: partial compliance with the pre-deposit requirement secured suspension of further recovery on the remaining disputed amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>