<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 283 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78176</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ordered a re-hearing of appeals filed by M/s. Aura Oil Industries and the Revenue due to a mistake in the original order, which led to confusion regarding the parties involved. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in rejecting both appeals and failing to provide clear findings on the case laws cited. After considering arguments from both sides, the Tribunal concluded that a re-hearing was necessary to rectify the mistake and ensure justice and clarity in the matter. Consequently, the appeals were directed to be listed for rehearing, and the applications for rectification of mistake were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 283 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78176</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ordered a re-hearing of appeals filed by M/s. Aura Oil Industries and the Revenue due to a mistake in the original order, which led to confusion regarding the parties involved. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in rejecting both appeals and failing to provide clear findings on the case laws cited. After considering arguments from both sides, the Tribunal concluded that a re-hearing was necessary to rectify the mistake and ensure justice and clarity in the matter. Consequently, the appeals were directed to be listed for rehearing, and the applications for rectification of mistake were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>