https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78156 The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal before CESTAT due to the applicant's genuine belief in pursuing the appropriate remedy based on advice received from registry personnel. Despite the significant delay, the Tribunal found the evidence presented by the applicant compelling, ultimately allowing the application in line with the principles established in the case of N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy. en-us Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78156 The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal before CESTAT due to the applicant's genuine belief in pursuing the appropriate remedy based on advice received from registry personnel. Despite the significant delay, the Tribunal found the evidence presented by the applicant compelling, ultimately allowing the application in line with the principles established in the case of N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78156