<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 281 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78153</link>
    <description>Rotary conical jacketed cylindrical dryer was classified under Heading 84.21 rather than Heading 73.11, bringing it within the scope of capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On that classification, the machinery qualified for credit and the denial of Modvat credit on the dryer was set aside. The separate claim relating to the batch controller was not pursued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 281 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78153</link>
      <description>Rotary conical jacketed cylindrical dryer was classified under Heading 84.21 rather than Heading 73.11, bringing it within the scope of capital goods for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. On that classification, the machinery qualified for credit and the denial of Modvat credit on the dryer was set aside. The separate claim relating to the batch controller was not pursued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>