<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 31 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78145</link>
    <description>A declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was covered by the Scheme where the customs duty liability had been determined on or before 31 March 1998. The Bombay HC held that the assessee could not be excluded merely because the demand related to warehoused goods or had arisen under section 72 of the Customs Act, 1962. Once the duty, interest, fine or penalty formed part of a tax arrear or demand notice within the Scheme period, the declaration was valid. Rejection on the ground that no dispute existed was contrary to the Scheme and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 31 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78145</link>
      <description>A declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was covered by the Scheme where the customs duty liability had been determined on or before 31 March 1998. The Bombay HC held that the assessee could not be excluded merely because the demand related to warehoused goods or had arisen under section 72 of the Customs Act, 1962. Once the duty, interest, fine or penalty formed part of a tax arrear or demand notice within the Scheme period, the declaration was valid. Rejection on the ground that no dispute existed was contrary to the Scheme and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>