<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 483 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78130</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the demand of CENVAT credit on Service Tax for outward transportation of finished goods. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case in favor of the appellant due to conflicting views on the interpretation of the place of removal and the relevance of a decision by a Larger Bench of the Tribunal. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of the duty and penalty demanded and granted a stay against the recovery of duty and penalty during the appeal&#039;s pendency, emphasizing the importance of considering conflicting views in taxation matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 483 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78130</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving the demand of CENVAT credit on Service Tax for outward transportation of finished goods. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case in favor of the appellant due to conflicting views on the interpretation of the place of removal and the relevance of a decision by a Larger Bench of the Tribunal. Consequently, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of the duty and penalty demanded and granted a stay against the recovery of duty and penalty during the appeal&#039;s pendency, emphasizing the importance of considering conflicting views in taxation matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>