https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78122 The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable before them, dismissing the preliminary objection raised by the learned DR regarding jurisdiction under Section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal clarified that issues of stock differences, including process loss, were not covered under the proviso related to loss of goods, citing previous decisions and the Tribunal's own rulings on identical issues for the appellant. The matter was directed for disposal of the stay application, confirming the appeal's maintainability before the Tribunal. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78122 The Tribunal held that the appeal was maintainable before them, dismissing the preliminary objection raised by the learned DR regarding jurisdiction under Section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal clarified that issues of stock differences, including process loss, were not covered under the proviso related to loss of goods, citing previous decisions and the Tribunal's own rulings on identical issues for the appellant. The matter was directed for disposal of the stay application, confirming the appeal's maintainability before the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78122