<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 671 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78121</link>
    <description>A broad, unqualified exemption notification for fuel-efficient light commercial vehicles was read to include chassis, because the notification and allied clarification did not restrict the benefit to any particular sub-heading or exclude chassis by implication. The earlier departmental acceptance of the same product reinforced that interpretation, and no basis was shown to depart from it. Once exemption applied, the duty demand failed and the associated penalty could not survive. The appeals were allowed and exemption relief followed with consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 671 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78121</link>
      <description>A broad, unqualified exemption notification for fuel-efficient light commercial vehicles was read to include chassis, because the notification and allied clarification did not restrict the benefit to any particular sub-heading or exclude chassis by implication. The earlier departmental acceptance of the same product reinforced that interpretation, and no basis was shown to depart from it. Once exemption applied, the duty demand failed and the associated penalty could not survive. The appeals were allowed and exemption relief followed with consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>