<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 49 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78118</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that charges collected by dealers from car buyers towards pre-delivery inspection and three free after-sale services are includible in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Applying the concept of &quot;transaction value,&quot; the Tribunal ruled that any amount recovered from the buyer, directly or indirectly, by reason of or in connection with the sale, including servicing and warranty-related charges, forms part of the assessable value, regardless of whether routed through dealers. Earlier reliance on precedents, including a prior decision in the manufacturer&#039;s own case treated as upheld by SC despite dismissal on limitation, was rejected. The departmental view was accepted and duty liability for the relevant period sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 49 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78118</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that charges collected by dealers from car buyers towards pre-delivery inspection and three free after-sale services are includible in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Applying the concept of &quot;transaction value,&quot; the Tribunal ruled that any amount recovered from the buyer, directly or indirectly, by reason of or in connection with the sale, including servicing and warranty-related charges, forms part of the assessable value, regardless of whether routed through dealers. Earlier reliance on precedents, including a prior decision in the manufacturer&#039;s own case treated as upheld by SC despite dismissal on limitation, was rejected. The departmental view was accepted and duty liability for the relevant period sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>