<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 562 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78117</link>
    <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where the entitlement to MODVAT credit on duty-paid welding electrodes remained debatable and had only been settled later by a Larger Bench after conflicting Tribunal views. The court treated the controversy as one lacking final clarity at the time relevant to the penalty, and on that basis upheld deletion of the penalty. It further noted that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, since the finding rested on the unsettled character of the credit issue rather than on any clear legal error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 562 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78117</link>
      <description>Penalty was held unsustainable where the entitlement to MODVAT credit on duty-paid welding electrodes remained debatable and had only been settled later by a Larger Bench after conflicting Tribunal views. The court treated the controversy as one lacking final clarity at the time relevant to the penalty, and on that basis upheld deletion of the penalty. It further noted that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, since the finding rested on the unsettled character of the credit issue rather than on any clear legal error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>