<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 448 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78116</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the CESTAT order regarding duty refund on HDPE tapes was allowed in favor of the revenue. The Court found insufficient evidence to support the assessee&#039;s claim of duty exclusion in the product cost calculation, leading to the reversal of relief granted by the Commissioner of Appeals and Tribunal. The burden was on the assessee to prove duty exclusion to avoid unjust enrichment, which was not adequately demonstrated. The original adjudicating authority&#039;s decision was restored, emphasizing the importance of proving duty exclusion in cost calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 448 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78116</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the CESTAT order regarding duty refund on HDPE tapes was allowed in favor of the revenue. The Court found insufficient evidence to support the assessee&#039;s claim of duty exclusion in the product cost calculation, leading to the reversal of relief granted by the Commissioner of Appeals and Tribunal. The burden was on the assessee to prove duty exclusion to avoid unjust enrichment, which was not adequately demonstrated. The original adjudicating authority&#039;s decision was restored, emphasizing the importance of proving duty exclusion in cost calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>