<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 230 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for verification of the purpose of input service use, emphasizing the absence of a need for segregation of amounts, and no penalties were deemed necessary in this instance. The matter was referred back to the original adjudicating authority for clarification on the utilization of input services without requiring segregation, with the appellants instructed to provide detailed explanations within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 230 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for verification of the purpose of input service use, emphasizing the absence of a need for segregation of amounts, and no penalties were deemed necessary in this instance. The matter was referred back to the original adjudicating authority for clarification on the utilization of input services without requiring segregation, with the appellants instructed to provide detailed explanations within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>