<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 192 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78080</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent in a case involving the classification of services as &quot;Clearing and Forwarding Agent Services&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. The respondent, acting as a del credere agent based on the agreement terms, was found not liable for service tax. The Court dismissed the appeal against the Revenue, emphasizing the consistency of past judgments in interpreting the law and aligning the services with Circular classifications. The Tribunal and the Appellate Authority&#039;s decisions were upheld, concluding that the respondent&#039;s services did not fall under taxable services as contended by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 192 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78080</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent in a case involving the classification of services as &quot;Clearing and Forwarding Agent Services&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994. The respondent, acting as a del credere agent based on the agreement terms, was found not liable for service tax. The Court dismissed the appeal against the Revenue, emphasizing the consistency of past judgments in interpreting the law and aligning the services with Circular classifications. The Tribunal and the Appellate Authority&#039;s decisions were upheld, concluding that the respondent&#039;s services did not fall under taxable services as contended by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>