https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78046 In an interim stay proceeding, the Tribunal held that where the demand could be worked out only after giving effect to a reasoned appellate order, the appellant should first get the demand quantified by the adjudicating authority. It declined to interfere at the interim stage and treated quantification as necessary before deciding the stay conditions. The Tribunal also required a partial pre-deposit of the quantified demand as a condition for continuance of stay during the appeal. Failure to comply within the stipulated time would result in vacation of the stay. en-us Mon, 17 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 May 2013 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78046 In an interim stay proceeding, the Tribunal held that where the demand could be worked out only after giving effect to a reasoned appellate order, the appellant should first get the demand quantified by the adjudicating authority. It declined to interfere at the interim stage and treated quantification as necessary before deciding the stay conditions. The Tribunal also required a partial pre-deposit of the quantified demand as a condition for continuance of stay during the appeal. Failure to comply within the stipulated time would result in vacation of the stay. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78046