https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78038 The court found in favor of the plaintiff on all issues. It held jurisdiction as both parties resided and worked in Delhi. The suit was within the limitation period. The cause of action was established, making the suit maintainable. Non-joinder of parties was deemed unnecessary. The plaintiff was entitled to recover the principal amount, interest at 24% per annum, and specific relief. The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, awarding costs and future interest at 12% per annum. en-us Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78038 The court found in favor of the plaintiff on all issues. It held jurisdiction as both parties resided and worked in Delhi. The suit was within the limitation period. The cause of action was established, making the suit maintainable. Non-joinder of parties was deemed unnecessary. The plaintiff was entitled to recover the principal amount, interest at 24% per annum, and specific relief. The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, awarding costs and future interest at 12% per annum. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78038