https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78013 A High Court cannot use its inherent jurisdiction to recall an earlier order quashing criminal proceedings unless a clerical error, omission, or similar mistake is shown. A request framed as recall will be treated as a review in substance, and review is barred in criminal proceedings under the Code. The earlier quashing order had been passed on merits after considering the material on record and the Tribunal's findings, including the view that continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process. Pending connected proceedings did not justify reopening the concluded order when no timely challenge had been pursued. en-us Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78013 A High Court cannot use its inherent jurisdiction to recall an earlier order quashing criminal proceedings unless a clerical error, omission, or similar mistake is shown. A request framed as recall will be treated as a review in substance, and review is barred in criminal proceedings under the Code. The earlier quashing order had been passed on merits after considering the material on record and the Tribunal's findings, including the view that continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process. Pending connected proceedings did not justify reopening the concluded order when no timely challenge had been pursued. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78013