https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78010 The court found in favor of the petitioner, M/s. Shree Renuka Sugars Limited, in a case concerning alleged customs duty evasion and misuse of duty exemptions. The impugned order suspending the petitioner's license was deemed invalid as it was issued after the conclusion of the enquiry, violating principles of natural justice. The court emphasized that the impugned order was unsustainable post-enquiry completion and set it aside due to gross violation of natural justice. Despite the availability of alternate remedies, the court exercised discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, highlighting that the existence of an alternate remedy does not preclude judicial review in cases of fundamental rights enforcement or natural justice violations. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78010 The court found in favor of the petitioner, M/s. Shree Renuka Sugars Limited, in a case concerning alleged customs duty evasion and misuse of duty exemptions. The impugned order suspending the petitioner's license was deemed invalid as it was issued after the conclusion of the enquiry, violating principles of natural justice. The court emphasized that the impugned order was unsustainable post-enquiry completion and set it aside due to gross violation of natural justice. Despite the availability of alternate remedies, the court exercised discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, highlighting that the existence of an alternate remedy does not preclude judicial review in cases of fundamental rights enforcement or natural justice violations. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78010