<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 439 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78008</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act was not applicable as duty was paid on the differential price, rejecting the demand for interest and penalty. It distinguished a Supreme Court decision, ruling that duty payment on the escalated price sufficed. The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s grant of immunity from penalty, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 439 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78008</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act was not applicable as duty was paid on the differential price, rejecting the demand for interest and penalty. It distinguished a Supreme Court decision, ruling that duty payment on the escalated price sufficed. The court upheld the tribunal&#039;s grant of immunity from penalty, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>