https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78007 An interim service tax dispute arose over whether the adjudged demand and penalties travelled beyond the allegations in the show cause notice. The CESTAT noted that the impugned order rested on grounds not set out in the notice, while the original adjudication had involved exemption notifications and the application of tax payment under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. On prima facie review, the liabilities were found inconsistent with the notice and therefore not sustainable at the stay stage. Pre-deposit of the adjudged dues was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeals. en-us Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78007 An interim service tax dispute arose over whether the adjudged demand and penalties travelled beyond the allegations in the show cause notice. The CESTAT noted that the impugned order rested on grounds not set out in the notice, while the original adjudication had involved exemption notifications and the application of tax payment under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. On prima facie review, the liabilities were found inconsistent with the notice and therefore not sustainable at the stay stage. Pre-deposit of the adjudged dues was waived and recovery was stayed pending disposal of the appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78007