<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 23 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77997</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, setting aside the impugned order and condoning the delay in filing the return. Consequently, the petitioner was entitled to carry forward and set off losses in accordance with the law. The court emphasized the importance of a fair and just approach in matters of condonation of delay, ensuring that parties are not unduly penalized due to technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 23 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77997</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, setting aside the impugned order and condoning the delay in filing the return. Consequently, the petitioner was entitled to carry forward and set off losses in accordance with the law. The court emphasized the importance of a fair and just approach in matters of condonation of delay, ensuring that parties are not unduly penalized due to technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>