<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 185 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77995</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside previous decisions and directing the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to restore and dispose of the appeal on its merits. The court emphasized the significance of genuine reasons for delay, principles of natural justice, and the right to challenge penalty orders, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and highlighting the importance of fair opportunities in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 185 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77995</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside previous decisions and directing the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to restore and dispose of the appeal on its merits. The court emphasized the significance of genuine reasons for delay, principles of natural justice, and the right to challenge penalty orders, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and highlighting the importance of fair opportunities in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>