<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 433 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77989</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, remanding the case for segregation of Service tax liability among different offices of the Respondent. Emphasizing jurisdictional correctness, it directed adjudication within respective office jurisdictions to safeguard Revenue interests and ensure compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 433 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77989</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, remanding the case for segregation of Service tax liability among different offices of the Respondent. Emphasizing jurisdictional correctness, it directed adjudication within respective office jurisdictions to safeguard Revenue interests and ensure compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>