<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 513 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77976</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision confirming the deletion of an addition under section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee provided sufficient evidence proving the genuineness of transactions, supported by affidavits, bank statements, and proof of transactions through banking channels. The Court emphasized that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 513 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77976</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision confirming the deletion of an addition under section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee provided sufficient evidence proving the genuineness of transactions, supported by affidavits, bank statements, and proof of transactions through banking channels. The Court emphasized that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>