<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 479 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77971</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the petitioner, involved in a Central Excise duty dispute, to deposit an additional sum within five weeks to stay recovery until CESTAT decides on the delay condonation application. Recovery against the petitioner was prohibited until CESTAT makes a decision or further orders on the stay application, contingent on the deposit being made within the stipulated timeframe. The petition was disposed of with this directive, granting protection against recovery subject to the specified conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 479 - Gujarat HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77971</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the petitioner, involved in a Central Excise duty dispute, to deposit an additional sum within five weeks to stay recovery until CESTAT decides on the delay condonation application. Recovery against the petitioner was prohibited until CESTAT makes a decision or further orders on the stay application, contingent on the deposit being made within the stipulated timeframe. The petition was disposed of with this directive, granting protection against recovery subject to the specified conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>