<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 409 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77968</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the disputed letters issued by the Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC). Apollo Paper Mills Ltd.&#039;s (APML) calculation of storage charges was accepted, directing CWC to refund the excess amount and release the consignment. The court also awarded costs of Rs.25,000/- to APML. The judgment emphasized CWC&#039;s non-compliance with the Bombay High Court&#039;s order and the need to adhere to the directive regarding warehousing charges based on specific rates and periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 409 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77968</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the disputed letters issued by the Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC). Apollo Paper Mills Ltd.&#039;s (APML) calculation of storage charges was accepted, directing CWC to refund the excess amount and release the consignment. The court also awarded costs of Rs.25,000/- to APML. The judgment emphasized CWC&#039;s non-compliance with the Bombay High Court&#039;s order and the need to adhere to the directive regarding warehousing charges based on specific rates and periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>