<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 459 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77965</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the explanation in the condonation application was accepted as sufficient. The Supreme Court noted that the High Court&#039;s refusal was supported by a cryptic order without adequate reasons, and held that the merits of the appeal should not be examined at the condonation stage. The operative principle was that, where delay is satisfactorily explained, the court should address condonation independently of the substantive merits, and relief should not be declined without reasoned consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 459 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77965</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the explanation in the condonation application was accepted as sufficient. The Supreme Court noted that the High Court&#039;s refusal was supported by a cryptic order without adequate reasons, and held that the merits of the appeal should not be examined at the condonation stage. The operative principle was that, where delay is satisfactorily explained, the court should address condonation independently of the substantive merits, and relief should not be declined without reasoned consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>