<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 722 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77940</link>
    <description>An order passed without notice to the petitioner or an opportunity of hearing was treated as procedurally infirm for breach of natural justice, and the Court confined its intervention to that defect without examining the merits of the dispute. The impugned order was set aside and quashed, while the authority was left free to pass a fresh order after giving due notice and hearing to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 722 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77940</link>
      <description>An order passed without notice to the petitioner or an opportunity of hearing was treated as procedurally infirm for breach of natural justice, and the Court confined its intervention to that defect without examining the merits of the dispute. The impugned order was set aside and quashed, while the authority was left free to pass a fresh order after giving due notice and hearing to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>