<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 449 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the imposition of a penalty equal to the duty evaded under Section 114A of the Customs Act. The Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reduce the fine from Rs. 1,35,000 to Rs. 75,000 was affirmed as reasonable, considering the value of the goods and lack of evidence on potential profits. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the fine reduction was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 449 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the imposition of a penalty equal to the duty evaded under Section 114A of the Customs Act. The Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to reduce the fine from Rs. 1,35,000 to Rs. 75,000 was affirmed as reasonable, considering the value of the goods and lack of evidence on potential profits. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the fine reduction was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=77937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>